Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3981 (AP)

Medini Venkata Subrahmanya Kutumba Sastry, v. Musunuri Balaji,

CRP/6592/2017 · 2026-06-23

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 24.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC011545322012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6592/2017 Between: 1. MEDINI VENKATA SUBRAHMANYA KUTUMBA SASTRY,, CULTIVATION, S/O. SURYA PRAKASA RAO, R/O. VASANTHAWADA, ELURU, W.G. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MUSUNURI BALAJI, UN-EMPLOYEE, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, R/O. SATRAMPADU, ELURU, W.G. DISTRICT. 2. M/S SRI VASAVI CHIT FUNDS, REP. BY ITS FOREMAN, MAIN BAAR, ELURU, W.G. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRPMP 7312 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the above CRP. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 8452 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may 2 be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the order in AS No.27/2008 dated 07.03.2012m on the file of V Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court) West Godavari, Eluru reversing the order in IP No.53/2005 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge's Court, Eluru pending disposal of the above CRP Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SITA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 6592 of 2017 ORDER: Though the matter is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal", there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasions, i.e., on 19.06.2026 and 22.06.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. The present Civil Revision Petition was filed in the year 2017, challenging the order dated 07.03.2012 passed in A.S. No. 27 of 2008 by the learned V Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), West Godavari at Eluru, whereby the order dated 01.11.2007 passed in I.P. No. 53 of 2005 by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eluru, was revised. 3. In view of the continuous absence of the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Civil Revision Petition. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. P.T.O. 4 Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. _______________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 24th June, 2026 cbn Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non reportable 5 203 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.R.P.No.6592 of 2017 24th June, 2026 cbn