09.09.2026 Serial no. 658 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (A) 2959 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Bauria PS Cse No. 111 of 2026 dated 12.06.2026 u/s 126(2)/308(2)/324(4)/303(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Hossen Kaji &Anr. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Tauhid Khan Mr. Atanu Haldar … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjan Chakraborty Mr. Abhijit Singh … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are similarly placed as other accused person who has been granted bail,. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. I have taken into account the locus of the present petitioners in comparison to the other accused who have been granted anticipatory bail in CRM (A) 2862 of 2026. Having considered the same, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioners. 2 Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners [Hossen Kaji and Benu Sen @ Benu Kumar Sen] be released on anticipatory bail subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioners shall meet with the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days from date and, thereafter, on all subsequent dates as would be fixed by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation till the report in final form is submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2959 of 2026 is disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3