[2026:RJ-JP:8080] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 4535/2013 Mahendra Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Chaturbhuj Agrawal, R/o Gulab Sameer C-20, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Banipark, Jaipur through Rajasthan Forest Development Centre Ltd., Bombay House, M.I. Road, Jaipur ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Narayan Lal Agarwal S/o Shri Panna Lal Agrawal R/o 1012, Mishra Rajaji ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur Prop. Naresh & Company, Jaipur. 2. State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 20/02/2026 1. The present criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that your lordships may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this misc. petition and further be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 04.10.2013 so far as it relates to the direction to deposit the entire amount of fine at once passed by the Additional District and Session Judge No.7, Jaipur Metropolitan and the petitioner may be granted 12 months time to deposit the balance amount of fine and further suitable direction may kindly be issued in this regard. Any other relief which deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case are also be granted to the petitioners.” [2026:RJ-JP:8080] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4535/2013] 2. In relation to the judgment dated 22.04.2009 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) No. 12, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, limited prayer has been made by the petitioner seeking direction to deposit the entire amount of fine as awarded vide order dated 22.04.2009 within a period of 12 months. 3. This Court finds that as a matter of fact, challenge has not been made to the judgment itself and the petitioner has accepted the imposition of fine to the tune of Rs. 6 lakhs, however, only relief prayed from this Court regarding grant of 12 months’ time to deposit the same. No interim order has been passed by this Court, in favour of the petitioner. It is found that the present criminal miscellaneous petition was filed in the year 2013 seeking a time period of 12 months. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of making efforts, he is unable to contact the petitioner, however, he candidly admits that the prayer made in the present petition was only to the extent of grant of 12 months’ time, which has already expired. 5. Thus, nothing survives for adjudication by this Court and by efflux of time, the prayer made in the present petition has also rendered infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 7. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, hereby stand disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J AARZOO ARORA /14-S.