Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39776 (CAL)

Ms V-Bro Engineering Services v. Gaurav Puraiya

CRC/16/2026 · 2026-09-11

Md Shabbar Rashidi, Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11.09.2026 Court No.13 Item Nos. 1 sp CRC 16 of 2026 In A.O. (COM) 5 of 2026 M/s. V-Bro Engineering Services, represented through Mr. Vinothkumar Ramakrishnan Vs. Sri Gaurav Puraiya, Sr. DEE/TRD/ADA/SER, South Eastern Railway Mr. Bhaskar Roy, Mr. Debanjan Dey. … for the appellant. Ms. Debjani Ghosal. ..for the alleged contemnor. 1. The alleged contemnor is virtually present before this Court. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant as well as the alleged contemnor that the order in question has been complied with. 3. In that view of the matter, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the instant contempt application. 4. Hence, CRC 16 of 2026 shall stand disposed of. 5. Rule shall stand discharged. 6. Personal presence of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with. 7. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)