Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3977 (CHH)

SMT. JYOTI RAO v. RAMESH RAO AAPURKAR

WP227/102/2021 · 2026-04-06

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15935 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 102 of 2021 1 - Smt. Jyoti Rao W/o Shri Deepak Rao Aged About 40 Years Resident Of Infront Of Vivekanand Ashram Over The Auto Center Raipur , Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Deepak Rao S/o Late Laxman Rao Aged About 52 Years Resident Of Infront Of Vivekanand Ashram Over The Auto Center Raipur , Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus Ramesh Rao Aapurkar S/o Late Laxman Rao Aapurkar Aged About 46 Years Resident Of Ward No. 11, Kailash Nagar, Kumhari District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Savina Agrey, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Seema Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ujjawal Agrawal, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.04.08 15:39:45 +0530 2 07/04/2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the proceeding before the learned trial Court has been concluded, therefore, she does not want to press the instant writ petition, as the same has become infructuous. 3. The submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by the respondent counsel. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit