Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3975 (BOM)

BHADANT ARYA NAGARJUN SHURAI SASAI v. DR. RAJENDRA RAMKRISHNA GAWAI AND OTHERS

WP/4253/2026 · 2026-08-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 925-wp 4253.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4253 OF 2026 ( BHADANT ARYA NAGARJUN SHURAI SASAI VS DR. RAJENDRA RAMKRISHNA GAWAI AND OTHERS ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or the directions, Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.D.Abhyankar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.P. Thakare, Advocate for respondent Nos.2, 5 and 7. Mr. Tufel Sharif, Advocate h/f Mr. A.T.Purohit, Advocate for respondent No.11. Mr. A.M.Joshi, AGP for respondent No.13 CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 18, 2026 1) The rejection of the application seeking rejection of Exh.1, as not maintainable, filed by respondent Nos.1 to 8, has led the petitioner to approach this Court by filing the present writ petition. 2) Admittedly, the application for clarification is pending before the learned Deputy Charity Commissioner, Nagpur, seeking clarification of the order dated 20/02/2026. 3) In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that, since the application for clarification is still pending, the learned Deputy Charity Commissioner shall consider the objection raised by the petitioner regarding the maintainability of the application and, after recording reasons in respect thereof, decide the application in accordance with law. KOLHE 2026:BHC-NAG:10730-DB 2 925-wp 4253.2026.odt 4) In that view of the matter, at this stage, we are of the opinion that the present petition is premature. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, if such occasion arises. ( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. ) ( ANIL S. KILOR, J. ) KOLHE Signed by: Mr. Ravikant Kolhe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 18/08/2026 20:07:44