10.09.2026 Serial no. 25 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1824 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Raghunathganj PS Case No. 622 of 2025 dated 12.05.2025 u/s 329(4)/117(2)/118(1)/109/74/89/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Khudu Sk. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Suman Bhanja Ms. Ushashi chattopadhyay Mr. Golam Ahammed … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Uttam Kumar Mondal Ms. Pritha Sinha … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 3rd April, 2026 and since then he is in custody. Learned advocate added that there is no possibility of the trial being concluded very soon, as such, he prays that the petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the court to the injury report as well as the statement of the injured. I have taken into account the overall circumstances and the complicity of the present petitioner as also the overt acts narrated by the injured. Moreover, the facts as are reflected from the case diary do not speak of the conduct of the petitioner is unblemished. 2 However, having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner and the overall circumstances, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Khudu Sk. shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Jangipur, Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned jurisdictional court and shall not leave the district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned jurisdictional court. Additionally, the petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Raghunathganj police station and will inform his place of residence while staying outside the jurisdiction of the concerned police station. The petitioner shall also attend the local police station once in a month till the evidence of vulnerable witnesses are examined by the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1824 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. 3 Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)