Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3973 (GAU)

SRI JITUL BORAH AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/377/2026 · 2026-04-05

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010072392026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/377/2026 SRI JITUL BORAH AND ANR S/O. LT. NITYANANDA BORAH, R/O. VILL.- NOWBOISHA, P/S. JORHAT, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM 2: DIPTI BORAH W/O. JITUL BORAH VILL.- NOWBOISHA P/S. JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A BRAHMA, MR. A LAL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 06.04.2026 Heard Mr. A. Lal, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R J. Baruah, learned Addl. PP for the State of Assam. 2. This is I.A has been preferred seeking correction of the Order dated 01.04.2026 passed in I.A.(Crl.) No. 1270/2025 in Criminal Appeal No. 226/2025 at paragraph No. 14 of the aforesaid order. It has been stated that “the applicant is allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety of the like amount.” 3. However, there are two applicants/appellants namely, Jitul Borah and Dipti Borah and accordingly, this clarified that both the applicants/appellants have been granted bail by this Court by the aforesaid Order dated 01.04.2026 as the remainder of the sentence in respect of both the applicants/appellants have already been suspended by the said order. 4. This order shall form a part of the Order dated 01.04.2026 passed in I.A.(Crl.) No. 1270/2025 in Criminal Appeal No. 226/2025. 5. I.A stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant