Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39724 (MAD)

Sri Vinayaga Agro Centre v. The Deputy State Tax Officer

WP/22398/2026 · 2026-06-23

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 22398 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 22398 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.24306 & 24307 of 2026 Sri Vinayaga Agro Centre Rep by its Partner Ravisankar SF No. 155/1, North Street, Panchayat Headquarter, Koothakudi, Kallakurichi - 606305 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer Kallakurichi Assessment Circle, No.103/5, Nepal Street, Kallakurichi -606 204. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records relating to the Order passed by the Respondent dated 16.12.2025 with Ref. No. ZD331225259326G pertaining to the Financial Year 2021-22 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Ms.H.Kirithika for Mr.Adithya Reddy For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ********* https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22398 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 16.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some recovery was made pursuant to the impugned order. Subject to giving credit thereto, she submits that the 25% of the disputed tax demand would be remitted. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to verifying and confirming and giving credit to recoveries made earlier and subject further to remittance of 25% of the tax demand in the aggregate within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22398 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 23-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Deputy State Tax Officer Kallakurichi Assessment Circle, No.103/5, Nepal Street, Kallakurichi -606 204. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22398 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 22398 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.24306 & 24307 of 2026 23-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis