Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39706 (CHH)

KRISHNA KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4932/2026 · 2026-10-13

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010380102026 2026:CGHC:44499 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4932 of 2026 1 - Krishna Kumar S/o Late Chhatrapati Parganiha Aged About 85 Years R/o Village Dhaba Tahsil Bhimbhouri, Distt- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Sub - Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Berla, Distt- Bemetara (C.G.) 3 - Vidya Kumar S/o Late Chhatrapati Parganiha R/o Village Dhaba Tahsil Bhimbhouri, Distt- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Alok Nigam, Advocate. For State/respondent : Shri Anil Pandey, GA. For Respondent No.3 : Shri Ankur Diwan, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14/10/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the legality, validity, and correctness of the order dated 10.08.2026 (ANNEXURE P/1) passed by Respondent No. 2, the Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue), Berla, District Bemetara, in Revenue Case No. 202305231600046/77/A-6/Year 2012-13 by which, Respondent No. 2 allowed the appeal preferred by Respondent No. 3 under Section 44(1) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 and set aside the mutation AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.10.15 10:51:23 +0530 2 certification order dated 05.06.2010 passed by the Tehsildar, Berla, in Mutation Register Entry No. 62 of Village Dhaba, and directed deletion of the Petitioner's name from the revenue records relating to Khasra No. 479/2, measuring 6.00 hectares. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this juncture, after taking instructions submits that petitioner has filed a second appeal before the Collector and therefore, at this stage, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and to pursue the Second Appeal. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash