[2026:RJ-JP:13677] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5629/2026 1. Neelam Kumari W/o Rohitash Kumar Jat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o- Ward No-09, Badi Dhani, Garh Taknet, Ajeetgarh, Amarsar, Dist-Sikar, Raj. 2. Sunita Yadav D/o- Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, R/o- Vikash Nagar, Ward No-01, Govindgarh Jaipur, Raj. 3. Makkhan Devi Yadav D/o- Chittar Mal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o- Aathuna Badh, Ghinoi, Jaipur, Raj ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj. 2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Director, Secondary Education Education, Bikaner, Raj. 4. District Education Officer, Secondary (Headquarter) Jaipur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Dhuwan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 30/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset, submitted that petitioners would be satisfied, in case, they are granted liberty to file representations for redressal of their grievances. 2. Learned counsel relies upon the order passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, in S. B. Civil Writ [2026:RJ-JP:13677] (2 of 2) [CW-5629/2026] Petition No. 3400/2026 (Ashish Palawant versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.). 3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners, to file representations before the Competent Authority, who shall decide the same within a period of 60 days. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. (ANAND SHARMA),J RACHNA /24