Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 397 (JK)

AFTAB AHMAD KHAN v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.PR.SECRETARY (FINANCE) AND OTHERS

WP(C)/563/2026 · 2026-03-30

Rahul Bharti

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 563/2026 CM(1435/2026). Aftab Ahmad Khan. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Saqib Amin Parray, Advocate. VERSUS U.T. Of J &K Th. Principal Secretary & Ors. …Respondent(s) Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE. ORDER 30.03.2026 01. When pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether subject matter of writ petition admits of cognizance by Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar Bench, the learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that he be given liberty to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar Bench. 02. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar Bench. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 30.03.2026 Bisma Jan. 06 Regular