- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628482026 NC: 2026:KHC:49663-DB WP No. 28347 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 28347 OF 2026 (GM-POL) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. THE UGAR SUGAR WORKS LIMITED A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANY'S ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MAHAVEER NAGAR, VAKHARBAGH SANGLI - 416 416 MAHARASHTRA STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS LIAISON OFFICER MR. VINAY ARVIND DESHPANDE S/O. LATE ARVIND AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE NO.317 9TH MAIN ROAD, 14TH CROSS JAYANAGAR, II BLOCK BANGALORE - 560 011 (A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956) …PETITIONER (BY SRI H.N. SHASHIDHAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by K P SWETHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628482026 NC: 2026:KHC:49663-DB WP No. 28347 of 2026 AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PARISARABHAVANA 5TH FLOOR, NO.49, CHURCH STREET BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY MEMBER SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR CANE DEVELOPMENT AND DIRECTOR OF SUGAR 5TH FLOOR, 'F' BLOCK, CBAB COMPLEX KHB BUILDING, CAUVERY BHAVAN K.G. ROAD BENGALURU - 560 009 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAVIVAR PET, BELAGAVI - 590 001 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ESCOM, VIDYUTH BHAVAN GOPANAKOPPA HUBBALLI - 580 023 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 29TH AUGUST, 2026 BEARING NO.PCB/155/HPI/17 CAT/2022/2026/293 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A UNDER THE WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT, 1974 AND ALSO THE ORDER DATED 29TH AUGUST, 2026 BEARING NO.PCB/155/HPI/17 CAT/2022/2026/294 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-B UNDER THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION)ACT, 1981 AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628482026 NC: 2026:KHC:49663-DB WP No. 28347 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the orders dated 29.08.2026 (Annexures-A and B) directing closure under Section 33-A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 [Water Act] and Section 31-A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 [Air Act]. 2. The petitioner submits that the impugned orders are premised on certain observations regarding non-compliance with certain measures, which were fully addressed. 3. The petitioner states that it established a sugar manufacturing plant with 500 TCD capacity at Ugarkurd, Kagwad Taluk, Belagavi District, Karnataka, in 1939. On 21.09.2022, the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board [KSPCB] issued a combined consent both under the Water Act and the Air Act for a period of five years for establishing an Ethanol Plant. KSPCB found - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628482026 NC: 2026:KHC:49663-DB WP No. 28347 of 2026 that the petitioner had failed to implement certain measures required to control the pollution and accordingly issued a notice dated 25.02.2025, putting the petitioner on notice of the proposed direction to issue a closure order. The said notice also set out certain observations on the basis of which the directions were proposed. The petitioner responded to the said notice. 4. Apparently, a complaint was also made to the Karnataka Lokayukta regarding the industry, and on 30.07.2025, the said Lokayukta issued a letter to the petitioner. 5. On 20.10.2025, a show cause notice was issued by KSPCB. The petitioner states that it had submitted a reply. However, apparently the same was not accepted. 6. On 24.11.2025, KSPCB once again issued a notice setting out the observations regarding non-compliance of certain measures and its proposal for issuing a closure order. 7. The petitioner claims that it submitted a reply on 09.05.2026, inter alia, stating that it had taken the necessary steps to comply with the directions issued by KSPCB. The officials of KSPCB once - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628482026 NC: 2026:KHC:49663-DB WP No. 28347 of 2026 again collected the water samples on 17.07.2026 from the petitioner's premises, and the petitioner claims that the analysis of those samples indicated that, except for one, other parameters are within the limits. A report dated 28.08.2026 was submitted, setting out the steps taken to comply with the observations. However, in the meantime, KSPCB had already taken a decision to issue the closure direction on account of non-compliance and accordingly, on 29.08.2026, issued the impugned orders. 8. In the aforesaid context, the petitioner filed the present petition. 9. Since the status report furnished by the petitioner on 28.08.2026 was not considered, the learned counsel for the KSPCB fairly stated on 07.09.2026 that a fresh inspection would be conducted to confirm whether the observations have been duly complied with. Today, he filed a memo enclosing a report of the inspection conducted on 09.09.2026. The said report indicates that the petitioner has taken steps to address most of the observations. 10. The learned counsel for the KSPCB fairy states that although some of the observations have been complied with and the - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628482026 NC: 2026:KHC:49663-DB WP No. 28347 of 2026 petitioner has taken steps as required; however, there are several areas where KSPCB is unable to confirm whether necessary measures have been implemented. He points out that the sugar industry is seasonal and no crushing activities are being undertaken at present. He submitted that it was therefore, not feasible to determine whether any measures have been taken to control the pollution which would be generated during the crushing activities. Illustratively, he states that there is no way to find out whether the boiler is generating any pollution, as the unit is currently non-functional. 11. In view of the above, we consider it apposite to set aside the closure orders dated 29.08.2026 with a further direction to KSPCB to once again inspect the premises immediately on commencement of the crushing activity. In the event the officials find that any of the observations made earlier still remain to be complied with, the KSPCB may revive the closure orders without any further notice based on the fresh inspection report. 12. It is also clarified that this order not preclude the petitioner from availing its remedies in respect of the revived closure order, - 7 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628482026 NC: 2026:KHC:49663-DB WP No. 28347 of 2026 albeit in accordance with law. The KSPCB has also suggested that the petitioner take steps to conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment by a reputed agency. The petitioner has no objection to this suggestion. Accordingly, we direct the petitioner to also take steps to comply with the said suggestion. 13. The petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE KPS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13