[2026:RJ-JP:8072] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2952/2026 Govind Jangid S/o Shri Babulal Jangid, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Plot No. 56, Narayan Vatika, Near Dhawas, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur, Rajasthan At Present Tenant Behind Manish Hotel, Rajat Path, Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Suresh Kumar Meena, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Soni, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 20/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.632/2025 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 303(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 06.10.2025 and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:8072] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2952/2026] 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed; the accused petitioner has been charged with the theft of a mobile phone, in addition to this allegation of several other criminal cases are also pending against the accused-petitioner. Perused the material available on record and the fact that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 06.10.2025 but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Govind Jangid S/o Shri Babulal Jangid is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the criminal antecedent(s) of the accused- petitioner, it is directed that if he is found to be involved in offence of similar nature in future, then the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the accused-petitioner by this Court. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on first week of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /15