IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4148 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2025 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Upendra Ravat S/O Late Vijay Ravat @ Late Bija Ravat R/O Village- Mangalpur Dhobi Tola, P.S.- Mohammadpur, District- Gopalganj ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Dilip Baitha S/O Birendra Baitha R/O Village- Mangalpur Dhobi Tola, P.S.- Mohammadpur, District- Gopalganj ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Ms. Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 12-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Special P.P. Ms. Usha Kumari No.1. 2. In view of the grounds taken in I.A. No.1/2025, the delay of 8 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. I.A. No.1/2025 is allowed. 4. This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 11.06.2025 in A.B.P. No. 936/2025, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XI-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gopalganj in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4148 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 Case No.62/2025, registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 as well as Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989. 5. In the nature of allegation as alleged in the FIR, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the appellant as the appellant is alleged to have assaulted the son of the informant by tangi on face causing injury. It is also fairly submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant that the injured suffered four injuries, out of which, three injuries are simple in nature and one injury is opined to be grievous. 6. The appeal is dismissed. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T