Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39651 (KAR)

SMT S M SAVITHRAMMA v. SMT NEELAMMA

CRP/270/2026 · 2026-09-11

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010203262026 NC: 2026:KHC:49772 CRP No. 270 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 270 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. S.M. SAVITHRAMMA W/O JAGADEESHA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/A. NEAR BATLI BUILDING, J ADIYAPPA BUILDING, HARIHARA - 577 601. 2. SMT. S.M. JYOTHI, W/O. VAGEESH. B.S., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A. KANCHIKERE VILLAGE - 583 125, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT. 3. SMT. S.M. REKHA, W/O GIRISH H K, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/A.SHYAMANURU VILLAGE - 577 004, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. 4. SMT. S.M. SUSHMITHA, W/O. JAYESH.T, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/A.MAGADI ROAD, SRIGANDHA KAVAL, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010203262026 NC: 2026:KHC:49772 CRP No. 270 of 2026 BENGALURU - 560 091. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRAPPA T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NEELAMMA W/O LATE SHYAMANURU BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/A MITTLAKATTE VILLAGE - 577 004, HARIHARA TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. 2. S.B. YOGESHAPPA, S/O. LATE S.M.BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/A.MITTLAKATTE VILLAGE - 577 004, HARIHARA TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.10.2023 PASSED IN OS NO.146/2021 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHARA., DISMISSING THE SUIT AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010203262026 NC: 2026:KHC:49772 CRP No. 270 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The order impugned is dated 27.10.2023 passed in OS.No.146/2021 on the file of learned II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Harihara. Whereby, the Court has dismissed the suit. Against that, the petitioner has filed the present Civil Revision Petition. 2. The office has raised an objection regarding the maintainability under Section 115 of the CPC. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. An order dated 27.10.2023 is challenged before this Court by filing a CRP on 16.03.2026. 3. The office objection is sustained, and the CRP is not maintainable. The petitioner is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to him in accordance with law, subject to the law of limitation. 4. It is made clear that the order is 2023. If the petitioner avails the remedy, the concerned Court has to consider the said delay in accordance with law. Accordingly, this Court is passing the following: - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010203262026 NC: 2026:KHC:49772 CRP No. 270 of 2026 ORDER i. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law and the issue of limitation is kept open. ii. All IA’s in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11 *AK