09.09.2026 Serial no. 657 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (A) 2958 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Kaliachak PSCse No. 269 of 2026 dated 22.02.2026 u/s 21(c)/25/27A/29 of the NDPS Act. -And- In the matter of : Sanjay Mandal @ Sanjoy Mandal … Petitioner(s) Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee Ms. Suchismita Chakraborty Mr. Arka Roy … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Brajesh Jha, APP Mr. Indradip Das Mr. Sanjib Das … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated only on the basis of statement of a co-accused in a case where there was alleged recovery of 817 gm brown sugar. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the Memo of Evidence reflects that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent relating to a case under the provision of NDPS Act. 2 Having considered the antecedent of the present petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2958 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)