Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3964 (ALL)

CHANDRA CHURN PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/17239/2026 · 2026-05-04

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 17239 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of non-bailable warrant issued against the applicant by learned court concerned in Criminal Case No.1650 of 2003, arising out of Case Crime No.252 of 1994, under sections 379, 411 IPC, P.S. Jamania, District- Ghazipur. 3. On perusal of entire record appended along with instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned non-bailable warrant, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to non-bailable warrant issued against him to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicant is directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to non-bailable warrant issued against him within Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Shukla, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chandra Churn Pandey .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) three weeks from today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. 7. Lastly, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has already been granted bail and as such learned court concerned may not compel him to prefer fresh bond and surety. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. May 5, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 17239 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad