09.09.2026 Serial no. 641 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (A) 2934 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Raghunathganj PS Case No. 695 of 2026 dated 03.06.2026 u/s 329(4)/64 of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Abu Tahir Sk @ Abu Taher Sk. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Golam Ahammed … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Subhashis Pachal Ms. Keol Mukherjee … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned jurisdictional court and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. The present petitioner happens to be the brother-in-law of the victim. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Having regard to the statement of the victim under section 183 of the BNSS, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. 2 Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2934 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)