Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39624 (KAR)

SRI. CHIKKAMUNICHINNAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/28199/2026 · 2026-09-08

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010617712026 NC: 2026:KHC:48600 WP No. 28199 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.28199 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. CHIKKAMUNICHINNAPPA S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE, R/AT YALIYURU VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATTANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVA KUMAR N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BEERASANDRA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010617712026 NC: 2026:KHC:48600 WP No. 28199 of 2026 4. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DATED 13.07.2026 (ANNEXURE-A) AND TO COMMUNICATE THE DECISION SO TAKEN TO THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has sought for consideration of the representation dated 13.07.2026 (Annexure-A). 3. Taking into consideration the averments made in the representation, wherein the petitioner has sought for restraining the respondent not to take any decision in respect of land belonging to the petitioner and as such, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010617712026 NC: 2026:KHC:48600 WP No. 28199 of 2026 I am of the view that such a representation cannot be ordered to be considered by the respondents. 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42