KHUSHAL S/O PURUSHOTTAM CHAWRE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS KORADI, TAH. DIST. NAGPUR AND ANR
BA/779/2026 · 2026-08-25
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3962 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3962 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 15-Cr.BA-779-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION [B.A.] NO. 779 OF 2026 Khushal S/o Purushottam Chawre -- VERSUS -- The State of Maharashtra and Another __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. B.W. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.M. Kadukar, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant No.1/State. Mr. R.S. Dhengre, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.
CORAM :
M.M. NERLIKAR, J.
DATE :
AUGUST 25, 2026.
Heard.
2.
This Court, by order dated 08/08/2025, has shown its disinclination to grant bail, however, liberty was granted to file bail application after the material witnesses are examined.
3.
The learned counsel for the applicant admits the fact that the material witnesses are yet not examined. Under such circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that when this Court has already shown its disinclination to grant bail and, since no material witnesses are examined, I decline to entertain the present application, and accordingly, the same is rejected.
[ M.M. NERLIKAR, J ] Piyush Mahajan 2026:BHC-NAG:11073 Signed by: Piyush Ramesh Mahajan Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 25/08/2026 16:48:08