SRI KHALEEL UR REHMAN KHAN v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/13294/2026 · 2026-09-07
E S Indiresh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39617 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39617 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010285552026 NC: 2026:KHC:48471 WP No. 13294 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.13294 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. KHALEEL UR REHMAN KHAN S/O LATE G. MOHAMMED FAZLULLA KHAN AND LATE SMT. HABEEBUNNISSA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS.
2.
SRI. A. ZAFFARULLA KHAN, S/O LATE G.M. AHMEDULLA KHAN AND SMT. MUNEERA KHATOON, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
3.
SRI. SAMIULLAH NOORULLAH KHAN, S/O LATE G. MOHAMED SAMIULLA KHAN AND SMT. NOORUNNISA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
4.
SMT. SHAISTA BEGUM, D/O LATE G.M. SANAULLA KHAN AND SMT. SHAHED BEGAUM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
5.
SRI. MOHAMED AKRAM PASHA, S/O LATE ABIDA KHATOON, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010285552026 NC: 2026:KHC:48471 WP No. 13294 of 2026
R/AT NO.351, 3RD FLOOR, 5TH CROSS, LAKSHMI LAYOUT, AREKERE, BENGALURU - 560 076.
6.
SMT. FAMIDA H.M., W/O H.M. IBRAHIM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.6, THIMMAIAH ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 051. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. IRSHAD AHMED K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED. BY ITS SECRETARY MULTI-STORIED BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
JOINT DIRECTOR OF REGIONAL LAND RECORDS CITY SURVEY-2, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560 001.
3.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, CITY SURVEY-2, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560 001.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010285552026 NC: 2026:KHC:48471 WP No. 13294 of 2026
4.
THE ENQUIRY OFFICER, CITY SURVEY-2, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560 001.
5.
THE COMMISSIONER BBMP NOW GREATER BENGALURU, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 002.
6.
THE REVENUE OFFICER, SHIVAJINAGAR WARD NO.92, BBMP NOW GREATER BENGALURU DISPENSARY ROAD BENGALURU – 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI. M.A. SUBRAMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NO. Panbhujani. CTC (B) REVISION 01/2022-23 DATED 07.12.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010285552026 NC: 2026:KHC:48471 WP No. 13294 of 2026
ORAL ORDER
The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Sri M.A. Subramani,
learned counsel accepts notice for respondent Nos.5 and 6.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 07.12.2023 at Annexure-A passed by respondent No.2.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that the great-grandfather of the petitioners acquired the land in question in the year 1923 and that the petitioners came to know about the change of khata subsequently. Accordingly, the petitioners have challenged the impugned order.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon careful consideration of the
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010285552026 NC: 2026:KHC:48471 WP No. 13294 of 2026
material on record, it is evident that the great- grandfather of the petitioners had acquired the land in question in the year 1923. Even after a period of 99 years, change of khata was not effected in respect of the land in question in favour of the petitioners or his predecessors-in-interest.
5. In view of the same, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners are required to establish their right, title and interest over the property in question in a manner known to law. Therefore, i am of the opinion that, no interference is called for in the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6