Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3961 (AP)

Mudunuri Subba Lakshrni v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/5276/2026 · 2026-06-30

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders: Nil Date of pronouncement: 01.07.2026 Date of uploading: APHC010329202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5276/2026 Between: 1. MUDUNURI SUBBA LAKSHRNI, W/U M. SATYANARAYANA RAJU,AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,R/O H.NO. 1-144, SATTI REDDY COMPLEX,BESIDE TATA SHOWROOM, KOMPALLY MAIL ROAD,KOMPALLY, MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT. 2. MUDURIURI SALYANARAYANA RAJU, ,S/O M. KRISHNAM RAJU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,R/O H.NO. 1- 144, SALLI REDDY COMPLEX,BESIDE TATA SHOWROGMRKOMPAHY MAIL ROAD,KOMPALLY, MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT. 3. SAKINETI KANAKA DURGA, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA RAJU,AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,R/O FLAT NO. 12, BLOCK NO.2, SIDDI FLATS,ADITYA GARDENS, NEAR BHARAT GAS GODOWN,SAI NAGAR, BATCHIPALLI, RANGAREDDY DISRICT, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI,THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER,GAJUWAKA POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATAM CITY,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. MUDUNURI SRAVANI GOWRI, W/O PRAVEEN KUMAR,AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,R/O D.NO23-10-69, SIMHAGIRI COLONY,GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): 2 Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.411 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, for alleged offence under Section 85 BNS(498-A IPC old Act), Sec. 3 & 4 DP Act, against the petitioners/Accused No.2 to 4, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of C.C. No.411 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the quash petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners/Accused No.2 to 4 herein in C.C. No.411 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the quash petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5276 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Instant Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the petitioners herein (A2 to A4), seeking to quash the proceedings in CC No.411 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam for the offences punishable under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 2. Heard Sri P.Siva Rama Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Nelothpal Ganji, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners herein are A2 to A4, who are charged for the offences punishable under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, CC No.411 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. 4. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners restricted his prayer to the extent of dispensing with 4 the personal appearance of petitioners herein in the C.C. proceedings before the trial Court. 5. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that there are specific allegations against the petitioners herein and as such, he opposed the prayer of the petitioners. 6. However, considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and after perusal of the entire material available on record, the presence of petitioners (A2 to A4) alone before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam in CC No.411 of 2025 is hereby dispensed with, except on those dates when the learned Judge feels that their presence is necessary. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 01.07.2026 PSA Whether the Order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5276 of 2026 Date: 01.07.2026 PSA