Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 396 (JK)

GULSHAN ARA AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND OTHERS

WP(C)/579/2026 · 2026-03-30

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 17 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 579/2026 Gulshan Ara and Anr. ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Arif Shah, Advocate V/S UT of J&K and Ors. ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Ms. Maha Majeed, AC vice Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE (ORDER) 30.03.2026 01. Petitioners are stated to have solemnized marriage out of their volition against the wishes of their respective families, who are now bent upon to disturb their marital life. Apprehending arrest by the police concerned, at the instance of private respondents, the petitioners have approached this court to seek protection to their life and liberty in application of the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in case titled “Lata Singh v. State of U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 475, and Shakti Vahini v. Union of India and others AIR 2018 SC 1601”. 02. Notice. Notice waived by Ms. Maha Majeed, learned assisting counsel on behalf of official respondents. 03. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 04. The documents placed on record by the petitioners do disclose that they have attained the age of majority and have entered into a wedlock Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document on 06.03.2026. Learned counsel for the petitioners’ states that the petitioners are entering into a wedlock for the first time and have not contracted any marriage prior to this. 05. Having regard to the ratio laid down by the Apex court in the judgment supra, as also the averments taken in the memo of petition, the petition is allowed and the official respondents are directed not to interfere with the petitioners’ marital life. This order shall not, however, be construed as an acknowledgment of the validity of marriage of the petitioners and any dispute in respect thereof would be independent of the directions passed herein above. 06. Disposed of. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 30.03.2026 “Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document