- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010030302013 NC: 2026:KHC:49037 WP No. 17078 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 17078 OF 2013 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION MYSORE DIVISION NEW BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION MYSORE BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER REP. BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER …PETITIONER (BY SMT. H R RENUKA., ADVOCATE) AND: SHIVANNE GOWDA AGED MAJOR S/O KOMAREGOWDA R/O HAMPAPURA VILLAGE AND POST K R NAGARA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT-570001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.L. SHEKAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE AWARD DATED:14.6.2012 PASSED BY THE LABOUR COURT, MYSORE IN REF. NO.17/2007 VIDE (ANNEXURE-H) AND ETC. Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010030302013 NC: 2026:KHC:49037 WP No. 17078 of 2013 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has called in question the award dated 14.06.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Mysuru in REF.No.17/2007 vide Annexure- H. 2. After service of notice, the parties have filed a Joint Memo dated 09.09.2026. The contents of the joint memo is extracted herein below: “JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in Ref No.17/2007 dated 14.6.2012 on the file of the Labour Court Mysuru, has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under: 1. The petitioner Corporation has agreed to reinstate the Respondent into service as a trainee as per the interim order Dated 09.07.2013. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010030302013 NC: 2026:KHC:49037 WP No. 17078 of 2013 2. The Respondent to be placed on probation notionally for a period of 2 years on successful completion of 2 years of training. 3. The Respondent to be confirmed after completion of probation for 2 years notionally. 4. The Respondent is not entitled for any difference of wages from the date of probation till the date of settlement. 5. The period of service rendered from the date of probation till the date of settlement shall be considered for the calculation of gratuity without extending any annual increments and any pay revision benefits. 6. The period of service rendered by the employee prior to the order of removal would not be considered for any purpose. 7. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms.” 3. The said joint memo signed by both the parties and their respective learned counsel, is taken on record. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010030302013 NC: 2026:KHC:49037 WP No. 17078 of 2013 4. In terms of the Joint Memo dated 09.09.2026, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 53