[2026:RJ-JP:10966] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 3023/2026 1. Jaikab @ Jaikam S/o Jumma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Navda, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (The Accused Petitioner Is Currently In Judicial Custody Since 01.11.2025) 2. Laden S/o Zakir, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Navda, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (The Accused Petitioner Is Currently In Judicial Custody Since 01.11.2025) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuj Rohila For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG Mr. Kailash Chand Bishnoi, IG Bharat- pur Mr. Sharan, S.P., Deeg Mr. Maneesh Sharma, SHO, Gopal- garh Mr. Bharat Singh, SHO, Kaman HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 16/03/2026 1. This second bail application has been filed by the petitioners Jaikab @ Jaikam S/o Jumma & Laden S/o Zakir, who were ar- rested by the police in connection with the FIR No.151/2025 regis- tered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act. The bail application of the petitioners [2026:RJ-JP:10966] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-3023/2026] was rejected by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge Kaman, District Deeg by order dated 09.02.2026. 2. Learned counsel submitted that the first bail application was withdrawn by the petitioners vide order dated 17.12.2025 with lib- erty to file a fresh bail application after filing of the charge-sheet, thereafter, the petitioners have preferred this second bail applica- tion under Section 483 of B.N.S.S.. 3. Learned counsel after arguing for sometime seeks permission to withdraw the misc. bail application qua accused-petitioner No.1 – Jaikab @ Jaikam S/o Jumma with liberty to file fresh after recording the statement of the Investigating Officer. 4. Accordingly, the misc. application qua accused-petitioner No.1 Jaikab @ Jaikam S/o Jumma is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. Learned counsel submitted that the Police after completing the investigation filed the charge-sheet and no recovery is required to be made. Learned counsel further submitted that no serious allegations are reported against him in the FIR. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the accused-petitioner No.2 Laden S/o Zakir, be enlarged on bail. 6. Mr. Kailash Chand Bishnoi, IG Bharatpur, Mr. Sharan, S.P., Deeg, Mr. Maneesh Sharma, SHO, Gopalgarh & Mr. Bharat Singh, SHO, Kaman present in person before the Court in terms of the order dated 23.02.2026. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor and the Officers present in person strongly opposed the bail application and informed this Court [2026:RJ-JP:10966] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-3023/2026] about the conduct of the accused-petitioner Laden S/o Zakir, who used the ATM Card and Bank account of some other person. 8. Be that as it may. 9. This Court after considering the charge-sheet, petitioner No.2 Laden is behind the bar since long, and noticing the fact that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent of any nature and without commenting upon merits of the matter, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner Laden S/o Zakir on bail. 10. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner No.2 - Laden S/o Zakir shall be released on bail on the following con- ditions:- 1. The accused-petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused- petitioner shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: - (i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioner have in his name. (ii) The accused-petitioner shall submit complete transaction statements of all of his active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital [2026:RJ-JP:10966] (4 of 5) [CRLMB-3023/2026] payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO. 3. The accused-petitioner shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioner shall surrender his passport, if he has, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court. 5. The accused-petitioner shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO. 6. The accused-petitioner shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order. 7. The accused-petitioner shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioner. 8. The accused-petitioner shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer. 9. The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the [2026:RJ-JP:10966] (5 of 5) [CRLMB-3023/2026] Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer. 10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused- petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. 11. The accused-petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation. 12. The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Monika/63