DEENADHAMA SHREE KESHAVA VIDYA SAMSTHE (REG.) v. SMT.RASHMI MAHESH
CCC/566/2026 · 2026-09-11
Jayant Banerji, Tara Vitasta Ganju
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39588 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39588 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010326792026 NC: 2026:KHC:49598-DB CCC No. 566 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 566 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
DEENADHAMA SHREE KESHAVA VIDYA SAMSTHE (REG.) VAKKODI VILLAGE, BELLAVI HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 572 107, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SRI.VENKATAPPA. …COMPLAINANT (BY SMT.PRIYANKA G.M., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT. RASHMI MAHESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PRIMARY EDUCATION, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. …ACCUSSED
2.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT.
PRIMARY EDUCATION M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.
…PROFORMA RESPONDENT NO.2
(BY SMT.B.SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR PROFORMA R2)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED
Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010326792026 NC: 2026:KHC:49598-DB CCC No. 566 of 2026
TO INFLICT APPROPRIATE PUNISHMENT AGAINST ACCUSED FOR HAVING COMMITTED CONTEMPT OF COURT BY DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 19.11.2024 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.23567/2024 (EDN-GIA) AS PER ANNEXURE- G AND PASS SUCH OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER/S OR DIRECTION/S AS DEEMED FIT TO PASS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
The instant petition is filed with a delay of 103 days. The cause sought to be demonstrated in the affidavit filed in support of I.A. No.1/2026 is not sufficient. Therefore, we reject I.A. No.1/2026. The contempt petition is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8