NIRMAL KUMAR SIKDAR v. BASANTI THAKUR PRADHAN RADHANAGAR GRAM PANCHAYAT
WPCRC/158/2026 · 2026-09-09
Bivas Pattanayak
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39565 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39565 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
09.09.2026 Sl. No.1 Ct. No.14 NB
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPCRC 158 of 2026
In W.P.A. No. 19117 of 2024
Nirmal Kumar Sikdar Versus Basanti Thakur, Pradhan, Radhanagar Gram Panchayat, District Bankura <
Ms. Malyasree Maity
… for the applicant-petitioner
Ms. Soujanya Das
Mr. Kazi Najesh Haque
Ms. Sadia Sultana
... for the alleged contemnor
1. Affidavit of compliance filed on behalf of the alleged contemnor is taken on record.
2. Ms. Soujanya Das, learned advocate for the alleged contemnor submits that the order of this Court has been duly complied with.
3. Ms. Malyasree Maity, learned advocate for the applicant- petitioner concedes to such submissions.
4. In view of the above, the contempt application being WPCRC 158 of 2026 stands disposed of.
5. Rule is discharged.
6. Personal appearance of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with.
7. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)