Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39565 (CAL)

NIRMAL KUMAR SIKDAR v. BASANTI THAKUR PRADHAN RADHANAGAR GRAM PANCHAYAT

WPCRC/158/2026 · 2026-09-09

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.09.2026 Sl. No.1 Ct. No.14 NB IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPCRC 158 of 2026 In W.P.A. No. 19117 of 2024 Nirmal Kumar Sikdar Versus Basanti Thakur, Pradhan, Radhanagar Gram Panchayat, District Bankura < Ms. Malyasree Maity … for the applicant-petitioner Ms. Soujanya Das Mr. Kazi Najesh Haque Ms. Sadia Sultana ... for the alleged contemnor 1. Affidavit of compliance filed on behalf of the alleged contemnor is taken on record. 2. Ms. Soujanya Das, learned advocate for the alleged contemnor submits that the order of this Court has been duly complied with. 3. Ms. Malyasree Maity, learned advocate for the applicant- petitioner concedes to such submissions. 4. In view of the above, the contempt application being WPCRC 158 of 2026 stands disposed of. 5. Rule is discharged. 6. Personal appearance of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with. 7. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)