Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3953 (ALL)

BIRENDRA BANSAL v. ANIL MITTAL AND ANOTHER

A227/6275/2026 · 2026-05-04

Vikas Budhwar

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6275 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents. 3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a direction to the learned Civil Judge (SD) Gautam Buddh Nagar to expedite and decide the Original Suit no.1189 of 2009 (Anil Mittal Vs. Birendra Bansal) for mandatory and permament injunction pending before the learned Civil Judge (SD) Gautam Buddh Nagar. 4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously. 5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the learned Civil Judge (SD) Gautam Buddh Nagar to expedite and decide the Original Suit no.1189 of 2009 (Anil Mittal Vs. Birendra Bansal) for mandatory and permanent injunction pending before the learned Civil Judge (SD) Gautam Buddh Nagar, in accordance with law, expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case, provided there is no other legal impediment. May 5, 2026 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kaushalendra Nath Singh, Nishi Sengar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Birendra Bansal .....Petitioner(s) Anil Mittal And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad