- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010573512026 NC: 2026:KHC:48644 WP NO.26445 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.26445 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. C. NAGARAJEGOWDA S/O CHIKKAMOGA @ KUNJA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT HAGALAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, C. A. KERE HOBLL, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 422. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISHNU SHARMA B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA – 571 401. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MANDYA SUB-DIVISION, MANDYA – 571 401. 3. THE TAHSILDAR MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 428. 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR C.A. KERE HOBLI-2, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 422. 5. SMT. NINGAMMA W/O VENKATEGOWDA, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010573512026 NC: 2026:KHC:48644 WP NO.26445 OF 2026 AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT AGRAHARA VALAGEREHALLI VILLAGE, VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 138. 6. SMT. JAYARATHNA W/O CHIKKARAJU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT KRISHNAPURA VILLAGE, VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 138. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 10TH JANUARY, 2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN CASE NO.R.P.83/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE- A AND ORDER DATED 15TH MARCH, 2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CASE NO.R.MISC-380/2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-B; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Aditya Diwakara, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 4. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010573512026 NC: 2026:KHC:48644 WP NO.26445 OF 2026 2. In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 10th January, 2025 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.1 in Case No.R.P.83/2023 and order dated 15th March, 2023 (Annexure-B) passed by the respondent No.2 in Case No.R.MISC-380/2016. 3. Heard Sri. Vishnu Sharma B.V., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Aditya Diwakara, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 4. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on careful perusal of the impugned order, it is forthcoming that the mutation in respect of the property in question has been changed in favour of the respondents 5 herein based on the registered Gift Deed dated 28th May, 1988. In that view of the matter, as the mutation has been changed based on the registered instrument, if the petitioner is having any grievance, he shall approach the competent Civil Court and to establish his right over the property in question. Therefore, I do not find any - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010573512026 NC: 2026:KHC:48644 WP NO.26445 OF 2026 perversity in the impugned orders passed by the respondent-Authorities. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK