Rabeen Manjhi @ Ravin Manjhi v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./71983/2025 · 2026-01-13
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39478 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39478 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71983 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- SINDHIYA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1 . Rabeen Manjhi @ Ravin Manjhi S/o- Late Raghunath Manjhi R/o - Musharniya, P.S - Singjiya, District - Samastipur, Bihar
2. Arvind Manjhi S/o- Late Raghunath Manjhi R/o - Musharniya, P.S - Singjiya, District - Samastipur, Bihar 3 . Vipin Manjhi S/o- Late Raghunath Manjhi R/o - Musharniya, P.S - Singjiya, District - Samastipur, Bihar
4. Prem Manjhi S/o- Late Raghunath Manjhi R/o - Musharniya, P.S - Singjiya, District - Samastipur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State . 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191 ( 2 ), 191 (3) , 190, 127 ( 2 ), 115 ( 2 ), 118 (1) , 109, 303 ( 2 ), 74, 352 and 351 ( 2 ) of BNS. 3 . As per the prosecution case , informant alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners assaulted informant and others by means of lathi, iron rod, frasa and axe due to which they sustained injuries and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71983 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026 2/3 also looted Rs. 4,000/- from them. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that allegation of assault is general and omnibus against them. F.I.R. has been lodged after the delay of 4 days for which there is no plausible explanation . Rest of the allegations are ornamental in nature to make the case grave . Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5 . Learned APP for the State opposed the bail and submitted that injury caused by petitioner No. 3 is grievous in nature . 6. Considering the fact that injury caused by petitioner No. 3 is grievous in nature , the prayer for pre – arrest bail of petitioner No. 3 is rejected. 7. Considering the nature of injury caused by petitioner Nos.
1 , 2, 4 and clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner Nos. 1 , 2, 4 as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st Rosera Samastipur in connection with Singhiya P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025 , subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71983 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023 . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T