2026:JHHC:8340 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 84 of 2023 ------ Jan Vikash Trust through its Secretary Mr. Ajit Kumar, aged about 48 years, Son of Late Rama Ballabh Tiwary, Resident of Lesliganj, P.O. + P.S. Lesliganj, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Nodal Officer, Jharkhand State Arogya Society, R.C.H. Campus, 4th Floor, Namkum, P.O. + P.S. Namkum, District-Ranchi. 3. Principal Secretary, (Health), State Appellate Authority, Nepal House Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Director-cum-Chairman, NGRC, National Health Authority, New Delhi at PO & PS-GPO, New Delhi 5. The Chairperson, State Grievance Redressal Committee, Jharkhand Rajya Arogya Society, 4th Floor, Directorate of Health Building RCH Campus, Namkum, P.O. + P.S. Namkum, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. The Chairperson, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Kanke, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District- Ranchi. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Venkatesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Om Prakash Tiwari, GP-I For the Resp. No. 6 : Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate ------ 09/ 24th March, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioners that petitioner had treated several patients under the Ayushman Bharat Scheme, but the amount which was supposed to be disbursed to the petitioner, has not be done. 3. After going through the affidavit filed by the Insurance- Company, I find that the in paragraph-7 they have taken specific plea that in the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojna (Ayushman Bharat Scheme) there is a mechanism for grievance redressal. In paragraph-9 they have stated that the petitioner has invoked the said provisions and has submitted their claim before the Grievance Redressal Committee which is pending. Further, in paragraph-10 it has been stated that in terms of the agreement entered into between the petitioner and the Insurance-Company, the contracting parties have agreed to incorporate Arbitration Clause in 2026:JHHC:8340 2 the agreement for implementation of the Ayushman Bharat Scheme. 4. Considering the aforesaid provisions since there is a efficacious alternate remedy available to the petitioner, at this stage I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to pursue the alternative remedy available to the petitioner in terms of the scheme and the agreement 12. Pending IA, if any also stands disposed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 24.03.2026 Pawan/CP-2 Uploaded 26.03.2026