Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3943 (UTT)

DEEPAK CHANDRA ADHIKARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPPIL/96/2025 · 2026-02-23

Ashish Naithani, Ravindra Maithani

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or ders or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:1173-DB WPPIL No.96 of 2025 Hon ’ble Ravin dr a Mait h an i, J. Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J. None for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Rajni Supyal Latwal, learned Brief Holder, for the State/1 and 2. 3. Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. 4. The challenge in the instant writ petition made to the advertisement dated 17.05.2025 and other related reliefs. 5. Today at the very outset, learned State Counsel submit that the short counter affidavit has been filed, according to which, impugned advertisement has already been cancelled by the State Government on 17.06.2025, and it has also been published in the newspaper. 6. For two reasons, the writ petition stands disposed of. (1) Petitioner is absent; (2) Impugned notification has already been cancelled. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) ( Rav in dr a Mait h an i, J.) 2 3 .0 2 .2 0 2 6 Arti/ Nitesh