Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39406 (CHH)

SMT. CHUNITA JANGRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4889/2026 · 2026-10-14

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010356582026 2026:CGHC:44575 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4889 of 2026 1 - Smt. Chunita Jangre W/o Suresh Kumar Jangre Aged About 46 Years R/o 6/159, B-Type, Godripara, Post - Kurasia, District - Manendragarh - Chirmiri-Bharatpur (M.C.B.) - 497553 (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District - Raipur, (C.G.) 2 - Collector And District Magistrate District - Manendragarh-Chirmiri- Bharatpur (M.C.B.) (C.G.) 3 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited (S.E.C.L.) Through Its Chairman- Cum-Managing Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) - 495006 4 - The Chief General Manager South Eastern Coalfields Limited (S.E.C.L.) Chirimiri Area, Post - West Chirimiri, District - Manendragarh- Chirmiri-Bharatpur, (C.G.) - 497773 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate along with Ms. Nandini Dwivedi, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, G.A. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Respondents No. 3 & 4 : Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/10/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “I. Issue writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction commanding Respondents/Authorities to immediately release and disburse the pending 12 months' vehicle hire charges (approx. ₹7,50,000/-) for the period 22.09.2022 to 11.07.2024 along with appropriate interest for the delayed payment. Il. Issue a direction to Respondents/Authorities to ensure. administrative compliance and coordination with each other for the immediate settlement of the petitioner's dues without shifting liability on each other III. Grant any other relief or directives that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. IV. Award the cost of this petition to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to pursue the representation already filed before the SECL. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 3 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat