2026:HHC:7759 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 3294 of 2026 Decided on : 19.03.2026 Rajeev Sharma …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Anil Kumar and Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation (Annexure P-7) with regard to the issues raised in the petition, but the same has not been 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:7759 decided by the Authority concerned till date. 3. Accordingly, as prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let representation (Annexure P-7) of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within a period of 4 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 19, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)