Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010363992026
2026:CGHC:44765-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 336 of 2026 1 - Ankit Singh (In Person) S/o Mahendra Singh Aged About 30 Years R/o Gevra Project, Police Station Dipka, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh, Mo. No.
9340079572. 2 - Gautam Porte S/o Late Sohan Singh Porte Aged About 21 Years R/o Hardi Bazar, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh, Mo. No. 9329934984.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Inspector General Of Police Bilaspur Range, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Station House Officer Police Station Deepka, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Station House Officer P.S. Hardi Bazar, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Axis Bank Limited Through Branch Manager, Deepka Branch, Katghora Road, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Regional Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Singh and Mr. Gautam Porte, petitioners-in-person. For Respondent/State : Mr. K. G. Yadav, Dy. Government Advocate. For Respondent No. 8 : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate. Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.10.16 18:14:19 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, Judge Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
16/10/2026
1. After arguing for some time, the petitioners-in-person seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present review petition with liberty to avail of the remedy available to them, as directed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.08.2026 passed in WPCR No. 480/2026.
2. The submissions made by the petitioners-in-person are not opposed by learned counsel for the opposite party.
3. In view of the submissions made by the petitioners-in-person, the present review petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Judge Alok