1 CGHC010203412018 2026:CGHC:44105 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 387 of 2018 1. Ganesh Singh, S/o Late Bhurelal, aged about 22 years. 2. Damyanti Bai, S/o Late Bhurelal, aged about 25 years. 3. Kaleshwari Bai, Wd/o Late Bhurelal, aged about 48 years. All Caste Gond, R/o Village Pipardol, Tahsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiffs) ... Appellants versus 1. Gulab Singh, S/o Late Maniram, aged about 45 years, 2. Newal Singh, S/o Late Maniram, aged about 42 years, 3. Maikin Bai, D/o Late Maniram, aged about 35 years, 4. Nanka Bai, Wd/o Late Maniram, aged about 65 years, 5. Badsiya Bai, Wd/o Premsingh, 65 years, 6. Phoolkunwar, S/o Late Premsingh, aged about 35 years, 7. Suraj Kunwar, S/o Late Premsingh, aged about 28 years, 8. Pataru Bai, D/o Late Premsingh, aged about 25 years, 9. Chandravati, D/o Late Premsingh, aged about 21 years, 10. Sadan Bai, Wd/o Dhaniram, aged about 60 years, 11. Sukhiram, S/o Late Dhaniram, aged about 32 years, 12. Dil Singh, S/o Late Dhaniram, aged about 30 years, 13. Budhiya Bai, D/o Late Dhaniram, aged about 35 years, SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.10.13 11:27:12 +0530 2 All Caste Gond, Respondent No.1 to 6, 10, 11 and 12 R/o Village Pipaldol, Tehsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Respondent No.7 R/o Village Majholi, Post Amadih, Tehsil Kotma, District Anuppur (M.P.) and Respondent No.8 and 13 R/o Village Sachratola, Tehsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, respondent No.9 R/o Village Badikhar, P.O. Bhad, Tehsil Kotma, District Anuppur (M.P.). 14. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellants : None present. For Respondent No.14 : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant Order On Board 12/10/2026 1. This appeal is directed against judgment & decree dated 23-2-2018 passed by the Additional District Judge, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur in Civil Appeal No.36A/2012, arising out of judgment & decree dated 16-8-2012 passed by the Civil Judge Class-II, Marwahi, District Bilaspur in Civil Suit No.172A/2009. 2. When the matter is called for hearing in two rounds, none present for the appellants to prosecute the appeal. No representation is made. 3. In absence of representation on behalf of the appellants, the Court has no option except to dismiss the appeal. 4. The second appeal is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge Soma