ANAY BARMAN ROY @ ANOY BARMAN ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/2917/2026 · 2026-09-09
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39366 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39366 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
09.09.2026 Serial no. 638 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (A) 2917 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Titagarh PS Cse No. 178 of 2026 dated 22.06.2026 u/s 115(2)/126(2)/3(5)/303(2)/324(2)/351(2) of the BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Anay Barman Roy @ Anoy Barman Roy
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Debajyoti Deb Mr. Anirban Kumar Banerjee
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a legal professional who has been implicated in a case over the issue of parking. There was a hot altercation which had bolstered up to such an extent that a criminal case had to be registered. State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and has drawn the attention of the court to the statement of the witnesses. I find from the materials in the case diary that two Judicial Officers were assaulted and even a police officer was assaulted.
2 Considering the nature of the offence committed, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2917 of 2026 is dismissed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)