Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010517302024 NC: 2026:KHC:49206 CRL.P No. 9936 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9936 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. ADARSHA S/O LATE RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
2. NAMRUTHA W/O ADARSHA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT D NO 240 GANESHA NILAYA, OLD POLICE STATION ROAD METAGALLI, MYSURU - 570 016.
3.
S.P. ABILASH S/O PRAKASH S M AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT SABANAKUPPE VILLAGE S R PATNA TALUK MANDYA DIST - 571 807
4.
HEMA BARGAVI B S D/O BASAVARJAN NAIR R/AT 70(HAIB 4,B) 10TH AMIN ROAD 1ST STAGE, GOKULA YASHWANTHPURA BANGALORE - 22 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHANKRISHNA R.G, ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010517302024 NC: 2026:KHC:49206 CRL.P No. 9936 of 2024
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SRIRANGAPATNA POLICE STATION REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE 01
2.
SMT. ROOPASHREE R W/O KIRAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A KAVERI EXTENSION CHANDAGALU ROAD, SRIRANGAPATNA TOWN MANDYA DIST. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAVEED.S, HCGP FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 (FILED U/S.528 BNNS) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED IN CR.NO.135/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr.Dn.) AND JMFC AT SRIRANGAPATNA, MANDYA DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 448, 323, 504, 506 R/W SEC.149 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL ORDER
Despite the matter being called out twice, there is no representation for the petitioners.
2. Nevertheless, the petitioners have not complied with the office objections despite granting sufficient
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010517302024 NC: 2026:KHC:49206 CRL.P No. 9936 of 2024
opportunity. Today, the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for seventh time. Though this petition is of the year 2024, it seems that the petitioners are not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16