Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3934 (KAR)

PURUSHOTHAM v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/3236/2026 · 2026-04-22

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22066 CRL.P No. 3236 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3236 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. PURUSHOTHAM S/O MUNIRAMU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 2. SANTHOSH, S/O MUNIRAMU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 3. SHIVA PRASAD @ PRASAD, S/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 4. SHIVAKUMARI @ SHIVAMMA, W/O MUNIRAMU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 5. MUNIRAMU, S/O LATE MARIAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF HOSASKABBALU, SATHANOORU HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TQ., BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 126 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SHILPA RANI.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22066 CRL.P No. 3236 of 2026 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SATHANOOR POLICE STATION, KANAKAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, OFFICE OF ADVOCATE GENERAL, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BANGALORE -560001 2. RAVIKUMAR H.S., S/O SIDDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/OF HOSAKABBALU, SATHANOORU HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TQ., BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 126 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.7/2026 BY THE SATHANOOR POLICE BENGALURU AGAINST PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 352, 118(1), 351(2), 115(2), 74, 3(5) OF BNS 2023 AND ALL CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS ON THE FILE OF THE 3RD ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KANAKAPURA AS PER ANNEXURE-A. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22066 CRL.P No. 3236 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the petition, the police after investigation have filed the final report-charge sheet. 2. In the light of filing of the charge sheet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and raise a challenge to the charge sheet. 3. Liberty so sought is granted. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17