09.09.2026 Serial no. 182 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1807 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Lalgola PS Case No. 881 of 2024 dated 26.08.2024 u/s 103(1)/61(2)/238/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Injabul Hoque @ Injamul HOque @ Sk. &Anr. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Milon Mukherjee Sr Adv. Mr. Usof Ali Dewan Mr. Asif Dewan … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Sayak Chakraborty Ms. Koel Mukherjee … for the State-respondent(s) Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for more than two years and charge-sheet has already been submitted. However, there has been no progress in the trial of the case. The petitioners are similarly placed as the other accused person who has been granted bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and has drawn the attention of the court to the statement of the witnesses to point out that there were overt acts of the present petitioners. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary. However, so far as the statement under section 180 of the BNSS and Section 183 of the BNSS is 2 concerned, the same witnesses have given different versions. I find from the statement under section 183 of the BNSS that the petitioners are similarly placed as the other accused person who has been granted bail. Having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner, I am of the view that further detention of the present petitioners is uncalled for. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioners viz, Injabul Hoque @ Injamul HOque @ Sk. and Jinarul Sk. @ Ladhu shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Lalbagh, Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioners shall also make themselves physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1807 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. 3 Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)