1 2026:CGHC:15161 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3620 of 2025 Ashwani Kumar S/o Bharat Kumar, Aged About 49 Years R/o Bhimpuri, Chowki- Junapara, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department Of Food, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 3 - Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 4 - Tahsildar, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 5 - Naib Tahsildar, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 6 - Mahendra Jaiswal, Society Manager, Paddy Procurement Center, Juna- para, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Adv. For Respondents No. 1 to 5 : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 1-4-2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs :- AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.04.02 15:03:04 +0530 2 (i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for all the records with regard to above illegal act of the respondent no. 6, in the interest of justice. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent higher authorities to take immediate strict legal action against the respondent no. 6 for his above illegal act. (iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to provide any other relief to the petitioner deemed fit on the fact and circumstances of the instant case. 2. After arguing for some times, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file better constituted petition afresh. 3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to allow above limited prayer. 4. As prayed, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak