SRI GANGADHARAIAH v. THE SPCIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER
RP/458/2024 · 2026-04-23
Ravi V Hosmani
Review Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3931 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3931 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22241 RP No. 458 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REVIEW PETITION NO.458 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
SRI GANGADHARAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE SIDDARAMAIAH, R/AT HALLENAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAKUNALA POST, KADABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572219. …PETITIONER (BY SRI JAGADISH BALIGA N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, TUMAKURU-572101.
2.
THE CHIEF ENGINEER, HEMAVATHI NALA, TUMAKURU-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BS GURUSWAMY, AGA FOR RESPONDENTS)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 19-06-2024 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN M.S.A. NO.14/2022 & ETC.
THIS RP COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2026.04.25 11:17:46 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22241 RP No. 458 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
None appears for petitioner.
2. Sri B.S. Guruswamy, learned Additional Government Advocate appears for respondents through Video Conferencing.
3. This review petition is filed against judgment dated 19.06.2024 passed by this Court in MSA no.14/2022.
4. Appeal was disposed of on merits after hearing counsel for appellant and learned AGA for respondents. Main ground urged in review is that at time of hearing, counsel for appellant could not bring to notice of Court certain decisions. Since matter was considered on submissions made in full, merely on ground that counsel did not rely on decisions cannot be a ground to seek review. No error apparent on face of record pointed out to entertain review. Review petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
GRD: CT:VP LIST NO.: 19 SL NO.: 1