- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010356492026 NC: 2026:KHC:47560-DB RP No. 279 of 2026 C/W WA No. 564 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REVIEW PETITION NO. 279 OF 2026 C/W WRIT APPEAL NO. 564 OF 2026 (S-RES) IN RP No. 279/2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI B M PRASANNA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O A K MANJAPPA, BEERAGONDANAHALLI, HONNALI TALUKU, DAVANAGERE-577224 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.P.HEGDE, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GANAPATHI BHAT., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577001 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT HONNALLI TALUK - 577217 Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010356492026 NC: 2026:KHC:47560-DB RP No. 279 of 2026 C/W WA No. 564 of 2026 3. THE BEERAGONDANAHALLI GRAM PANCHAYATHI HONNALLI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577224 REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER 4. SMT RANJITHA BO W/O GANESH G N, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O BEERAGONDANAHALLI, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE-577224 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.R.JAGADEESWARA., ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1, R2 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED.16.03.2026 PASSED IN WRIT APPEAL NO.690/2024 AND CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE THE WRIT APPEAL NO.690/2024 FOR HEARING IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. IN WA NO. 564/2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI B M PRASANNAKUMAR S/O A K MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, BEERAGONDANAHALLI, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT 577 224 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. P.P HEGDE, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GANAPATHI BHAT., ADVOCATE) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010356492026 NC: 2026:KHC:47560-DB RP No. 279 of 2026 C/W WA No. 564 of 2026 AND: 1. RANJITHA B.O., W/O GANESH G N AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS WORKING AS BILL COLLECTOR BEERAGONDANAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH BEERAGONDANAHALLI HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. R/A BEERAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577217 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ 3RD GATE, 3RD FLOOR M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFFICE OF ZILLA PANCHAYATH LOKIKKERE ROAD OPPOSITE DOORADARSHAN KENDRA DAVANAGER-577005 CHITRADURGA-577501 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFFICE OF TALUK PANCHAYATH HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577217 5. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BEERAGONDANAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, BEERAGONDANAHALLI - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010356492026 NC: 2026:KHC:47560-DB RP No. 279 of 2026 C/W WA No. 564 of 2026 HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577224 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18/12/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.26247/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION NO.26247/2023 FILED BY RESPONDENT NO.1, ETC. THIS PETITION ALONG WITH WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF) This Review Petition is filed seeking review of the judgment and order dated 16.03.2026 passed in Writ Appeal No.690/2024, whereby this Court dismissed the writ appeal finding no ground to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010356492026 NC: 2026:KHC:47560-DB RP No. 279 of 2026 C/W WA No. 564 of 2026 3. The principal contention urged by the petitioner is that there is an error apparent on the face of the record warranting review of the order passed in the writ appeal. 4. We have carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the judgment and order sought to be reviewed. 5. We do not find any error apparent on the face of record to review the order dated 16.03.2026. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. 6. It is also noticed that Writ Appeal No.564/2026 is connected with the present proceedings which arises out of common order under challenge in W.A.No.690/2024. Since we have already dismissed the writ appeal (W.A.No.690/2024), the present appeal does not survive for independent consideration. 7. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment and order dated 16.03.2026 passed in W.A. No.690/2014. - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010356492026 NC: 2026:KHC:47560-DB RP No. 279 of 2026 C/W WA No. 564 of 2026 8. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending IAs, if any, do not survive for consideration and accordingly, they stand disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1