MANISH BENIWAL SON OF SHRI MANJEET SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7163/2021 · 2026-04-13
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3930 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3930 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15321] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7163/2021 Manish Beniwal Son of Shri Manjeet Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of House No. 222, Rama Market, Preetampura, Delhi. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through the PP.
2. Victim D/o Shri Suresh Kumar, R/o C-119, Near Dakshin Marg, Vidyadhar Nagar, BITS Campus Pilani, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaswant Singh for Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Neha Goyal.
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 13/04/2026
1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time.
2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long,
[2026:RJ-JP:15321] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7163/2021] on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the status of the case reflected on the Trial Court’s website, the petitioner has been acquitted. Counsel submits that under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with the instant petition, hence, the same has become infructuous.
4. Considering the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/13