CRL OP No. 9567 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9567 of 2026 1. Sathishkumar S/o. Murugan, Door No.4/1/3, TKN Venkatachalam Street, Kannankurichi, Salem District. 2. Moorthi S/o. Soundarrajan, No.55, Gandhi Nagar, MGR Silai Near. Kannankurichi, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by its, The Inspector of Police, KANNANKURICHI Police Station, Salem District (Crime No. 82 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No. 82 of 2026, on the file of the respondent and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondent(s): MR.P.DHILEEPAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 132 & 351(2) of BNS, in Crime No.82 of 2026 on the file of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9567 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners asked mamool from the Tasmac shop. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that they are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the second petitioner is involved in two previous cases and if anticipatory bail is granted, it will send a wrong signal to the society. Therefore, he opposed the petition. 5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that there are two previous cases pending against the second petitioner and if anticipatory bail is granted, there is every likelihood that the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9567 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 petitioners would commit similar kind of offence. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 17-04-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police, KANNANKURICHI Police Station, Salem District (Crime No. 82 of 2026) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9567 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 9567 of 2026 17-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis