Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3930 (CAL)

AMAL MANDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/2100/2025 · 2026-01-28

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

M/L 245 28.01.2026 Bpg. Dismissed as not pressed C.R.M. (M) 2100 of 2025 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Gazole Police Station Case No.458 of 2020 dated 09.10.2020 under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act; Amal Mandal Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick. …for the petitioner. Mr. Kaustav Banerjee. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to pursue with the present bail application. As none appears on behalf of the State, Mr. Kaustav Banerjee, learned advocate empanelled with the State is directed to represent the State. His appearance may be regularized by the concerned authorities. In view of the submission advanced by the petitioner, CRM(M)2100 of 2025 is dismissed as not pressed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 2