Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010584392017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3380/2017 Between: 1. GALLA PHANI BHUSHANA RAO, KRISHNA DIST, S/O.LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, D.NO.77- 52-2, PRAKASH NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-15, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. YANDRAPALLI VIJAYA LAKSHMI KRISHNA DIST, W/o.Narasimhulu, Hindu, Aged about 48 years, Property, R/o.Plot No.1853, New Rajive Nagar, Vijayawada -15, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the Order dt.21-3-2017 in E.P.No.38/2016 in O.S.No.1302/2013 on the file of the court of the VI Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 4452 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P.No. 38/2016 in O.S.No. 1302/2013 on the file of the court of VI Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Vijayawada, Krishna District pending disposal of the revision petitin in the interest of justice and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GHANTASALA UDAYA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: The present C.R.P is filed challenging the order dated 21.03.2017 in E.P.No.38 of 2016 in O.S.No.1302 of 2013 passed by the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada. It transpires from the record that, there is no interim protection granted by this Court at the time of admission of this C.R.P. 2. On 25.06.2026, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court had directed the Registry to list this matter for dismissal. Even today, no appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner did not evince interest to prosecute. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ____________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J Date: 30.06.2026 MNR Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No 4 115 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3380 OF 2017 Dt: 30.06.2026 Mnr