Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 393 (RAJ)

PERIPHERY SANGHARSH SAMITI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10694/2021 · 2026-03-09

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, Vinit Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10075-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10694/2021 Periphery Sangharsh Samiti, Jawaja, District Ajmer, Through Ms. Deepu Gehlot D/o Sh. Champa Lal Gehlot Aged Around 26 Yrs. Sarpanch - Media Village Panchayat, Panchayat Samiti Jawaja, Ajmer (Rajasthan) R/o Shobhapura, Dungri Road, Near Bhomiya Ji Ka Than, Beawar, Ajmer - 305901. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur - 302005. 2. The Secretary Urban Development, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur - 302005. 3. The Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Government Of Rajasthan, G-3, Raajmahal Residency Area, C-Scheme, Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur - 302016, Rajasthan. 4. The District Collector, Ajmer. 5. The Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 6. Municipal Counsil, Near Mission Ground Beawar, Through Its Chief Executive Officer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Kumar Mishra. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma, for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG. HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR O R D E R 09/03/2026 Ms. Sharma, learned assisting counsel to Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG, representing the respondents-State, submits that the notifications [2026:RJ-JP:10075-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-10694/2021] dated 17.01.2025 & 19.03.2025 are now governing the field in the present matter. In view of the above, the present writ petition, has become infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed. All pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 68-Zeeshan/Rashmi