Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3929 (ORI)

BABAJI SETHY v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/11685/2026 · 2026-04-23

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 11685 of 2026 Babaji Sethy `…. Petitioner Represented by Mr. D.K.Ray, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha & Ors …. Opposite Parties Represented by Ms. J.Sahoo, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 23.04.2026 W.P.(C). No. 11685 of 2026 & I.A. No. 7135 of 2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “The petitioner, therefore, humbly prays before this Hon’ble Court and this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice why the R.P. Case of the petitioner will not file before the Tahasildar, Rajanagar, Kendrapara or, before the Commissioner, Consolidation, Cuttack. Or, any other order/orders, direction/directions may be passed by this Hon’ble Court, in favour of the petitioner. And, for this act of kindness the petitioner shall as on duty bound ever pray.” 4. The petitioner’s limited grievance is that his revision application for correction of area is not being accepted by the Order No. 01. 2 | P a g e Commissioner, Consolidation and Settlement, Cuttack. There is no reason why the revision shall not be accepted. 5. The writ application is disposed of directing the Commissioner, Consolidation and Settlement, Cuttack to accept the revision to be submitted by the petitioner within a week and thereafter deal with it in accordance with law. 6. Status quo with regard to plot in question shall be maintain till acceptance of the revision petition. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge